<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>Digitally Mastered</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thumannator.com/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thumannator.com/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.thumannator.com,2008://1</id>
   <updated>2008-10-22T12:09:23Z</updated>
   <subtitle>Various mathematical and not so mathematical thoughts...</subtitle>
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Publishing Platform 4.01</generator>


<entry>
   <title>Rules For Cell Phone Reviews</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thumannator.com/2008/10/rules_for_cell_phone_reviews.html" />
   <id>tag:www.thumannator.com,2008://1.41</id>
   
   <published>2008-10-17T12:21:51Z</published>
   <updated>2008-10-22T12:09:23Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I am in the market for a new cell phone or two. In the past, I have been careless and bought a phone that just seemed cool and ended up being an expensive piece of junk. Now when I phone...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thumannator.com/">
      <![CDATA[I am in the market for a new cell phone or two.  In the past, I have been careless and bought a phone that just seemed cool and ended up being an expensive piece of junk.  Now when I phone shop, I do thorough reviews and search for any and all information about prospective phone candidates (if I can get the user's manual, which I usually can, that is excellent!).  Ultimately, I rely on reviews by owners.  Both <a href="http://www.amazon.com">Amazon.com</a> and <a href="http://www.phonescoop.com">Phonescoop</a> are really good sources for these reviews.  I just think there should be some rules for reviewers:

1) Reviewers should state their age:  teenagers write very different reviews compared to <strike>grown up kids</strike> adults who write very different reviews compared to <strike>nerds</strike> gadget geeks.  I can usually tell which ones are written by the teenagers because they leave the ubiquitous comment about how fast or slow texting can be accomplished with the reviewed phone.

2) Do not make comments about your service provider's coverage without giving your city.  These comments are pretty much useless without the second bit of information.

3) There are a lot of negative comments out there about how lousy the cameras are on cell phones.  Here, I would suggest not leaving the comment at all.  If you want to take nice pictures, go buy a nice camera.

I think that covers the important points.  Any other suggestions?]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>A New Ranger</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thumannator.com/2008/08/a_new_ranger.html" />
   <id>tag:www.thumannator.com,2008://1.40</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-30T04:00:00Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-05T04:16:25Z</updated>
   
   <summary>That&apos;s right, there&apos;s a new walker, Texas Ranger in town. When I got home from work today, Malika walked from in front of the fireplace all the way across the room to the couch where I was sitting (about 12...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thumannator.com/">
      <![CDATA[That's right, there's a new walker, <strike>Texas Ranger</strike> in town.  When I got home from work today, Malika walked from in front of the fireplace all the way across the room to the couch where I was sitting (about 12 or 13 feet), and then turned around and walked all the way back to the fireplace.  So, Malika is officially walking now.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Styrofoam Experiment</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thumannator.com/2008/08/styrofoam_experiment.html" />
   <id>tag:www.thumannator.com,2008://1.39</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-24T04:45:17Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-24T05:09:28Z</updated>
   
   <summary>The other day, I sat in a Taco Bell munching away at my lunch. As I had gone by myself and had no one to talk to, I did my very best to avoid making eye contact with other customers....</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thumannator.com/">
      <![CDATA[The other day, I sat in a Taco Bell munching away at my lunch.  As I had gone by myself and had no one to talk to, I did my very best to avoid making eye contact with other customers.  This led me to stare at my tray a good bit, and as such, I began to take notice of the great mass of paper on my tray.  I had three paper wrappers from three crunchy tacos (I could not get my usual two chalupas and one crunchy taco, standard for my visits to Taco Bell, because the fryer was not working--who knew that part of chalupas were fried?).  If you know me well, you know I do not customarily fall in line with the mainstream environmentalist movement.  It is not because I think it is an unworthy goal, I just think that the "science" behind the man-made global warming does not even follow the scientific method.  And global warming dominates the present day environmentalists' thinking.  However, I do find it somewhat tragic that we order our fast food meals and give little thought to all the paper wrappers, cups, and thin cardboard boxes that we throw in the trash that wind up in landfills and such.  Did God really intend for us to bury our trash in the ground?  Is that being good stewards of the Earth?  I do not have the answer.  I am just as quick as everyone else to throw my fast food trash into the trash bin and move on (when I bring my lunch to work with me, I try to pack it in nothing but reusable containers, not even little baggies which just get thrown away).  But, as I stared at my wrappers, I remembered when McDonald's provided their Big Macs in styrofoam cartons.  McDonald's got dogged pretty hard for this in the 1980s, I believe, which is why those of us brave enough to go to McDonald's even after seeing <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0390521/"><em>Super Size Me</em></a> now get our Big Macs in cardboard cartons.  The argument was that all of those styrofoam cartons do not break down very quickly and would still be present in our land fills something like 100+ years later.

Some 20 years later, I wonder if those styrofoam containers really are still lurking around.  I personally believe that all God created has an amazing ability to recover from injury and contamination: people, animals, and even the Earth itself.  If so, could it be that these styrofoam containers have all broken down?  Is there anyone out there brave enough to dig into a landfill to have a look?  I wonder what would be found.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>New Name</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thumannator.com/2008/07/new_name.html" />
   <id>tag:www.thumannator.com,2008://1.38</id>
   
   <published>2008-07-11T22:27:12Z</published>
   <updated>2008-07-11T22:31:51Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I think I finally settled on a name for this site. I had originally used &quot;Chaotically Random Musings,&quot; but dropped that because a surprisingly large number of blogs incorporate &quot;random musings&quot; into their names. The new name heralds back to...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thumannator.com/">
      I think I finally settled on a name for this site.  I had originally used &quot;Chaotically Random Musings,&quot; but dropped that because a surprisingly large number of blogs incorporate &quot;random musings&quot; into their names.

The new name heralds back to a phrase that, to my recollection, came to be in the mid-1990s and was popularized by the return of a bit of pop culture.  I will let my readers try to guess the reference...
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Chick-Fil-A vs. Everyone Else</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thumannator.com/2008/06/chickfila_vs_everyone_else.html" />
   <id>tag:www.thumannator.com,2008://1.37</id>
   
   <published>2008-06-12T12:27:54Z</published>
   <updated>2008-06-12T12:35:42Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I had one of McDonald&apos;s new chicken biscuits for breakfast yesterday. It was gross. Even a little overcooked. Such has been my experience at most restaurants. I was first introduced to the chicken biscuit at Chick-Fil-A and I must say,...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thumannator.com/">
      I had one of McDonald&apos;s new chicken biscuits for breakfast yesterday.  It was gross.  Even a little overcooked.  Such has been my experience at most restaurants.

I was first introduced to the chicken biscuit at Chick-Fil-A and I must say, no other restaurant seems to be able to make these little breakfast treats better than Chick-Fil-A.  Their&apos;s are never overcooked, and tastefully seasoned.  The one from McDonald&apos;s and other places are always bland.

If you do not have a Chick-Fil-A where you live, I pity you.  You&apos;re truly missing out.
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Little Smile</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thumannator.com/2008/06/little_smile.html" />
   <id>tag:www.thumannator.com,2008://1.36</id>
   
   <published>2008-06-02T11:41:31Z</published>
   <updated>2008-06-02T11:46:23Z</updated>
   
   <summary>It has been a while since I posted. Life has been extremely busy. Due to requests, I have been working on some updated picture galleries of Malika. I am about half done. So, here is a preview. This is Malika...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thumannator.com/">
      <![CDATA[It has been a while since I posted.  Life has been extremely busy.  Due to requests, I have been working on some updated picture galleries of Malika.  I am about half done.  So, here is a preview.  This is Malika just being herself.  Sometimes she looks at you with this cute little smile that generally develops into a full 5-toothed grin.

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="smile.jpg" src="http://www.thumannator.com/images/smile.jpg" width="425" height="640" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;"/></span>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Hopefully, Lesson Learned</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thumannator.com/2008/04/hopefully_lesson_learned.html" />
   <id>tag:www.thumannator.com,2008://1.35</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-17T03:49:15Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-17T03:51:39Z</updated>
   
   <summary>When writing a program, regardless of programming language, one should never use variable names that are identical to functions intrinsic to the programming language of choice. Such a mistake kept me busy for a while this afternoon. Just a friendly...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thumannator.com/">
      When writing a program, regardless of programming language, one should never use variable names that are identical to functions intrinsic to the programming language of choice.  Such a mistake kept me busy for a while this afternoon.  Just a friendly reminder.
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Words That Are Easy To Mispronounce For 400</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thumannator.com/2008/02/words_that_are_easy_to_mispron.html" />
   <id>tag:www.thumannator.com,2008://1.34</id>
   
   <published>2008-02-26T01:17:20Z</published>
   <updated>2008-02-26T01:20:21Z</updated>
   
   <summary>A brief list to ponder: colonel resilient epitome That last one has daunted me for years until tonight....</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thumannator.com/">
      A brief list to ponder:

colonel
resilient
epitome

That last one has daunted me for years until tonight.
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Digitally Restricted Media</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thumannator.com/2008/02/digitally_restricted_media.html" />
   <id>tag:www.thumannator.com,2008://1.33</id>
   
   <published>2008-02-11T05:15:31Z</published>
   <updated>2008-02-11T05:41:38Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I do not know who the genius was that coined the phrase &quot;digitally restricted media,&quot; but it is the perfect definition for the acronym &quot;DRM.&quot; At present, it is widely known to mean &quot;digital rights management&quot; which is the copy...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thumannator.com/">
      <![CDATA[I do not know who the genius was that coined the phrase "digitally restricted media," but it is the perfect definition for the acronym "DRM."  At present, it is widely known to mean "digital rights management" which is the copy protection being used to restrict playback of downloaded media (music, movies, etc.) to certain software and hardware.  I am going to go along with the new meaning I have now heard, the "digitally restricted media."  It seems more accurate and in line with the money hungry music and movie industries.

Like I said, I do not know who came up with it, but I first heard it as an email or call-in on the HDTV Podcast, which you can find <a href="http://htguys.com">here</a>.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Why Ron Paul?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thumannator.com/2008/01/why_ron_paul.html" />
   <id>tag:www.thumannator.com,2008://1.32</id>
   
   <published>2008-01-12T02:53:04Z</published>
   <updated>2008-01-18T04:15:40Z</updated>
   
   <summary>So, I have had this Ron Paul banner over to the right for a while now, but not given much explanation. I will try not bore my readers with too much to say, just some highlights. First of all, after...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thumannator.com/">
      <![CDATA[So, I have had this Ron Paul banner over to the right for a while now, but not given much explanation.  I will try not bore my readers with too much to say, just some highlights.  First of all, after having tried out both of the two dominant political parties in the U.S., I would now pretty much label myself an independent.  I could possibly be one of the coveted "swing voters" I suppose, but I am pretty picky.  Why independent?  Both parties have "let me down."  Both the Democrats and the Republicans, with but a few exceptions, have lost all ability to control spending.  They tax hard working American citizens, and then spend it on "programs" that we may or may not agree with.  Sound fair to you?  These programs are out of control.  The average American family pays 25% of their income in taxes!

Ron Paul has fought against the programs that our tax dollars pay for on the grounds that they are not constitutional.  I know there has been some controversy about him putting "earmarks" into bills and then voting against them.  I have to admit, I have not spent enough time following up on Ron Paul's explanation for this, but I do not think he is doing a bad thing.  Regardless, I believe the Constitution allows for 17 or 18 "programs" that the Federal government is allowed to spend money on and I believe this is covered in Article I, Section 8.  I am not completely sure about this.  I thought I had heard it was 18, but I count only 17 items in that section.  There might be another in the amendments that I have missed.

There has also been some talk of him making racist comments.  I think he has cleared this up pretty well.  Apparently the comments were published in a newsletter that he distributed during the 1980s and 1990s.  Ron Paul has stated that the comments were made by a member of his staff.  The staff member was fired, and Ron Paul issued an apology.  I seriously do not believe he is racist.  In fact, he discusses racism among his <a href="http://www.ronpaul2008.com/issues/">issues</a>.

So, here is what I think is good about Ron Paul:

1)  He wants to get rid of the IRS and eliminate the federal income tax.  That will put money back in the pockets of every American.  Can he pull it off?  Seeing has how Congress sets taxes, I admit, he will have a very hard time pulling it off, but it is worth a try.

2)  Ron Paul wants the U.S. to stop policing the world.  Our biggest fight right now is in Iraq and was started on the premise that terrorists were hiding out under the protection of Saddam Hussein, and he had weapons of mass destruction that could presumably be used against the U.S.  As we all now know, there were no such weapons, and in my opinion, the terrorist link between Iraq and 9/11 is weak if not non-existent.  Why have we spent so much money fighting in Iraq when the guy who is said to be the mastermind behind 9/11, Osama, is in Afghanistan or Pakistan?  A few months ago, most Americans were mostly displeased with the war and wanted troops home.  I believe Ron Paul would get them home faster than even the Democratic presidential candidates.  Hillary herself has said that she would bring the troops home, but does not know the full situation in Iraq and thus cannot lay out a time table until elected president.  I think Ron Paul would start bring our troops back within his first month in office as president.  This would be good because...

2a)  ...if our troops are here in the U.S., we can actually defend our borders.  As the old adage says, the best offense is a good defense, right?  Well, not specifically a Ron Paul point, just my personal opinion.

3)  Ron Paul wants to return our nation to a gold standard.  Again, a constitutional issue.  The Constitution allows only for gold and silver to even be used as money in the U.S.  Look at our money now.  Our dollar is nose-diving against foreign currencies.  Returning to a gold standard would strengthen the value of our dollar and likely strengthen our economy.

4)  ...I'm getting tired of writing.  Basically, Ron Paul wants the federal government interference in the lives of individuals to be set back to the extremely low limits set in the Constitution.  Check out what else he has to say <a href="http://www.ronpaul2008.com/issues/">here</a>.  It only takes about 20 minutes to read through all of the issues Ron Paul discusses on his web site.

While you're at it, read the <a href="http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html">Constitution</a> for yourself and then learn more about it <a href="http://www.usconstitution.net">here</a>.  I bet most U.S. citizens have never even read the Constitution!

I think Ron Paul has some great ideas and I think it would be worthwhile for you to check him out.  I back him strongly at this time, but I will caveat my support with this:  Ron Paul is a person, and people will always let you down in some capacity.  This is more true with politicians.  I like what Ron Paul stands for, but I recognize that he will most likely not accomplish all that he plans to do.  Even so, I believe he would serve the U.S. far better than any other candidate in the race.  So, bearing in mind that he too will have shortcomings, I encourage you to at least check out <a href="http://www.ronpaul2008.com">Ron Paul</a>.

Finally, whoever wins, remember whether or not you like the new president and other elected officials, 1 Timothy 2:1-2 reminds us to pray for them:

<blockquote>First of all, then, I urge that supplications, prayers, intercessions, and thanksgivings be made for all people, for kings and all who are in high positions, that we may lead a peaceful and quiet life, godly and dignified in every way.</blockquote>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Global Hoax</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thumannator.com/2007/12/global_hoax.html" />
   <id>tag:www.thumannator.com,2007://1.31</id>
   
   <published>2007-12-11T23:02:18Z</published>
   <updated>2007-12-17T23:53:48Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I remember watching an Earth Day TV special back in the late 1980s or early 1990s. I do not remember exactly what year this was. It seems like it was maybe the 20th annual Earth Day or so. The thing...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thumannator.com/">
      <![CDATA[I remember watching an Earth Day TV special back in the late 1980s or early 1990s.  I do not remember exactly what year this was.  It seems like it was maybe the 20th annual Earth Day or so.  The thing about it that I remember the most was that Christopher Lloyd was a part of this TV special reprising his role as "Doc Brown" from the Back To The Future movies (which is probably also why I bothered watching this special--I was very into those movies).  I am pretty certain that global warming was discussed during this TV special and was probably my first, or nearly first, introduction to the topic (though, global warming worked its way into many a <a href="http://www.weeklyreader.com">Weekly Reader</a> which I had to read in school back then).

I used to fall for the global warming propaganda back in those days.  How could I not?  I would have been about 12, faithfully ingesting everything my government funded public school system threw at me.  Why would they have presented anything to me that was not fact?

Fast forward to present day.  I have long since dismissed man-made global warming as scientific fact.  The global warming "movement" has gained substantial momentum since the release of Al Gore's "documentary" on the subject, <i>An Inconvenient Truth</i>.  I have not watched this film, but I did take the time to look through the book of the same name.  I am told the material in both the movie version and the book is identical or nearly identical.  The book presented very little scientific fact, in my opinion.  It seemed to largely be a collection of pictures.  There were some speculative charts and graphs too.  My conclusion after looking through it was this:  if you show the right pictures and make the right comments about those pictures, people will believe man is slowly elevating the temperature of Earth.  But there was no credible science presented!  In fact, the book came across to me as more of a child's picture book.  How ironic that in this particular bookstore, the children's section was in the next aisle...

I say all that to suggest to my readers that they consider a few other sources that I believe present credible science.  First of all, a guy named Marlo Lewis has written an almost point-by-point critique of <i>An Incovenient Truth</i> that I have not personally finished reading, but I found Lewis's presentation much more compelling that Mr. Gore's.  You can find this work called "A Skeptic's Guide to <i>An Inconvenient Truth</i>" <a href="http://www.cei.org/pages/ait_response-book.cfm">here</a>.  The document is available in PDF format by chapter.

Another source is a book called <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Unstoppable-Global-Warming-Updated-Expanded/dp/0742551245/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1197408671&sr=8-1">Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1,500 years</a>.  I just got this book and have not read much of it, but I heard an interview with the first author, S. Fred Singer and thought he was a very credible scientist.  Al Gore as you may recall, is a politician, not a scientist.

I especially like these two sources because they have actually cited credible reference material.

Now, if you do not feel you have time to read through those two sources, consider a few thoughts and apply some simple logic:  carbon dioxide is often pointed to as the leading culprit behind global warming.  Our cars and coal/natural gas power plants are pointed to as the major man-made carbon dioxide producers that are causing global warming.  Oh yeah, humans and animals exhale carbon dioxide.  Are our natural breathing processes causing global warming?  No doubt, if successful in limiting carbon dioxide emissions from our cars and power plants, our ridiculous politicians will next try to limit how much we breathe!

If you have never been to a true greenhouse, I encourage you to go to one.  It will indeed be warmer in the greenhouse than the outside ambient temperature, but I believe the cause has more influence from the higher water vapor concentration (increased humidity) than the carbon dioxide output.  I do not have time to provide resources on the influences of water vapor at the moment, but I will try to post more information in the future.  Actually, I believe both of the sources I mentioned above talk about it at some point, but you can search the internet for more.

Now, do not get me wrong.  Obviously, I am not buying the global warming/carbon dioxide connection.  However, I do think it is important to take care of our planet.  Pollution certainly does not seem to do any good, and in general, I find it pretty gross--especially during those times that I am stuck behind some 20-year old diesel delivery truck and I am driving with my windows down.  Yuck!  It is hard for me to breathe.

I do not know why the global warming thing has taken off and gained such momentum, or what Al Gore's purpose is behind it all.  With Mr. Gore's recent Nobel award, he has once again proved what a hypocrite he is:  on his journey to accept the prize, he took the train from the airport to his hotel publicly commenting that "trains are symbols of environmental consciousness," while his luggage road in a motorcade.  Go <a href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/12/08/gore-takes-train-oslo-airport-luggage-takes-mercedes">here</a> for the news article.

Still, from the standpoint of taking care of Earth, I think some good things are coming of it.  There is a move in the U.S. to start opening more nuclear power plants (which are safe and clean).  And, then there is <a href="http://www.teslamotors.com">Tesla Motors</a>.  I would love one of these:

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="tesla.jpg" src="http://www.thumannator.com/images/tesla.jpg" width="381" height="286" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;"/></span>

Hopefully, as they keep making advancements, they'll get up to 1000+ miles on a single charge.  Very cool as it is though, because most other all-electric cars cannot go further than about 40 miles on a single charge.

Anyway, I want to encourage my readers to think through things for yourself with a little logic before you eat up everything our media and Hollywood heroes expect us to believe without question.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>That&apos;s Daddy&apos;s!</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thumannator.com/2007/11/thats_daddys.html" />
   <id>tag:www.thumannator.com,2007://1.29</id>
   
   <published>2007-11-10T05:24:42Z</published>
   <updated>2007-11-10T05:42:07Z</updated>
   
   <summary>However, my favorite hat does look awfully cute on Malika....</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thumannator.com/">
      <![CDATA[However, my favorite hat does look awfully cute on Malika.
<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="DSC_0002a.jpg" src="http://www.thumannator.com/images/DSC_0002a.jpg" width="330" height="496" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;"/></span>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Comet Holmes</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thumannator.com/2007/11/comet_holmes.html" />
   <id>tag:www.thumannator.com,2007://1.28</id>
   
   <published>2007-11-10T05:04:55Z</published>
   <updated>2007-11-10T05:24:07Z</updated>
   
   <summary>If you haven&apos;t heard, there is a comet, Comet Holmes, that is currently pretty easy to spot in the Northern Hemisphere. I went out this evening and spotted it. Even without binoculars or a telescope, and within city lights no...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thumannator.com/">
      <![CDATA[If you haven't heard, there is a comet, Comet Holmes, that is currently pretty easy to spot in the Northern Hemisphere.  I went out this evening and spotted it.  Even without binoculars or a telescope, and within city lights no less, you can make the comet out as a hazy blob.  It was more impressive with my 10x binoculars.  Look for it near the Perseus constellation.

If you want to learn more, <a href=http://cometography.com/pcomets/017p.html>here's</a> a good site with some pictures.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Break On Three</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thumannator.com/2007/10/break_on_three_1.html" />
   <id>tag:www.thumannator.com,2007://1.27</id>
   
   <published>2007-10-31T04:14:30Z</published>
   <updated>2007-11-01T04:11:44Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Earlier this year, Spider-Man 3 was released to theaters nationwide. I had managed to get my wife interested in the series a while back, so we were really looking forward to the latest installment. We did not try to see...</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Movie Review" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thumannator.com/">
      Earlier this year, Spider-Man 3 was released to theaters nationwide.  I had managed to get my wife interested in the series a while back, so we were really looking forward to the latest installment.

We did not try to see it opening day, and negative reviews quickly surfaced.  Most reviews seem to grumble that the story strayed too far from what was originally presented in the comic books.  Having been an avid Spider-Man reader in the mid-1990s, I suspected I knew why folks were downing the altered story.

Well, our efforts to see the movie in the theater, and even an attempt at a nearby drive-in, were all thwarted for one reason or another.  This happened at least three if not four times.  Finally, we gave up and decided to wait until the movie was released to DVD.

Today was that day.  We rented it, picked up a pizza, put the baby to sleep, and pushed play.  Wow!  It really was bad!  And, being familiar with the original comic book storyline, the changes to the story are not what made this movie so bad in my opinion.  I think I would argue it was the poor acting put forth for almost all of the characters, the ridiculous inclusion of numerous gags, and the &quot;favors&quot; that were handed out to non-actors so that they could participate in the movie (I caught three of them:  Stan Lee of Marvel Comics fame once again made a pointless cameo, one of the producers was the security guard in the armored van that Sandman filled with sand, and the director&apos;s daughter was the one whose camera was purchased by Mr. Jameson for $100).

The story was overall a bit weak anyway, not to mention a bit depressing.  But there was some good.  I thought the final battle had some redeeming elements for characters and storyline--it was good to see a lingering plot line from the first movie finally resolved.  But that is all the good I could find.

Overall, I think Spider-Man 3 may very well have brought the Spider-Man movie franchise to its end for now.  This seems to happen with comic book based movies.  The series of Batman movies that began in 1989 had two good ones, and then tanked (though, Batman Begins was an excellent reboot to the series and I look forward to the upcoming Batman flick).  I think it is safe to say X-Men will not be making any more theater appearances (though rumors abound of the Wolverine spin-off movie which would be great because I think Wolverine is cool).  I never got into Superman much, but I think that series had similar performance.  I am sure there are others I am forgetting right now.

I guess comic book movies just break down at their third installment.  Weird.  And disappointing.
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>More Pictures</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thumannator.com/2007/10/more_pictures.html" />
   <id>tag:www.thumannator.com,2007://1.25</id>
   
   <published>2007-10-10T03:41:13Z</published>
   <updated>2007-10-10T03:52:03Z</updated>
   
   <summary>There&apos;s more pictures of Malika up here....</summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Malika" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thumannator.com/">
      <![CDATA[There's more pictures of Malika up <a href=http://thumannator.com/images/malika2>here</a>.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>
